I found this article to be much more interesting than the first article simply because I have done a multigenre paper and it was fascinating for me to see how others responded to this task. It’s really hard for me to try and summarize this article in a way that will make sense to everyone because my thoughts are so jumbled, but I’m going to give it a go.
I agree that the usual research paper is a dull regurgitation of information that’s already out there for people to find. My first adaptation of a research paper was in the 12th grade when I was assigned a research project. It was pretty much like a research paper, but in powerpoint form which was not terribly interesting either. On page 529, Moulton writes “At the same time, they still taught research and documentation skills,” which I think is a very important point. In our world of technology, students are claiming to not understand what is and isn’t plagarism. I feel it’s extremely important as teachers to have a plagarism workshop of sorts so that we can make sure our students understand when to cite a source. I would even go so far as making them sign a contract stating that they understood plagarism, this way, if an issue arises later in the year, we could just pull out that contract and there would be no argument. Also, with seemingly infinite information on the Internet, it’s important to teach our students how to identify reliable information.
I liked the point Moulton made about multigenre papers requiring “that the student think about what has been researched and interpret it from the subject’s point of view or the point of view of others from that time period.” The multigenre paper really gives students a chance to activate their imaginations and really involve themselves in the novel, character, etc that they’ve chosen to focus on. The reflection papers at the end of the assessment is a wonderful idea, I think, because it allows students to reflect on the project and say what they like and didn’t like which provides excellent feedback for the teacher for future reference.
It appears that the endnotes are what really qualify this paper/project as research. The endnotes are what allows this paper to take the lace of a traditional research paper. It’s the way that the teacher assess the depth and quality of the students’ research to let the teacher know just how hard the student really tried to understand the novel, character, etc.
I think that bringing everyday writing into the classroom for a huge final paper is exciting. The students know how to write letters, directions, instructions, newspaper articles, etc. and this multigenre paper really lets them experiment with different styles and different ways of presenting an interpretation of a text or person. “Unlike the traditional reserach paper, it encourages teachers to teach students to think about what they’ve learned from their research and to make use of what they already know about different genres of writing.”
Thinking Questions:
1. What do you guys think about using 8 genres? I personally feel that it’s too much for high school students (I’m thinking more along 4 or 5) but what do you all think?
2. How would you, as a teacher, decifer and explain the difference in genres to your students?
3. In high school (and middle school maybe) do you guys think it would be better to offer students some structure? For instance, have students pick a novel that was read during the semester or assign an individual research novel to each student (to insure variety of projects) and have them take on a character from the novel? This way, when writing a rationale for the assignment, you could relate it to the semester’s work.